![]() Having a stadium with seats closer to the field should make for a louder, more exciting environment when the game is underway. Related Story: Early evaluations of Kansas AD Travis Goff's coaching hires While a reduction in seating capacity isn’t exactly something many fans were clamoring for, it’s not hard to see why it makes sense and why it could be beneficial on game days. Having been a KU fan and student himself, Goff has shown in multiple ways in his two years on the job that he has a great feel for what matters to the fanbase. And thus far, it’s hard not to trust his judgement when it comes to making the best decision for KU Athletics. Kansas Athletic Director Travis Goff and his staff have put in a lot of work and effort to turn this into reality. Finally, after all these years, it’s happening. Reasons for excitementįirst and foremost, the new football stadium is happening. Understandably, many KU fans took to social media to voice their concerns with some of these changes, but there are pros and cons to the suggested proposals released yesterday. The consultant’s recommendations would also eliminate the parking lot and grassy area directly east of the stadium – a key location for parking and tailgating for fans. However, in order to fit those additional structures, the consultant is recommending that KU reduce seating in Kansas David Booth Memorial Stadium to 39,839 seats, which would be a decrease of more than 7,000 seats from the stadium’s current capacity. The unnamed consultant is recommending a 55,000-square-foot conference center, a 175-room upscale hotel, and a 2,500-seat concert and event venue among other facilities as part of the project. There is also a rendering of what the new area could look like once the project is completed. The article covers all kinds of updates including proposals from the outside consultant that KU has hired as part of the process. Send ideas for future episodes to ABA Journal Senior Writer Stephanie Francis Ward.ĪBAJournal.Yesterday, more details regarding the upcoming renovations to the Kansas football stadium and the surrounding “campus gateway” project were announced in a piece from the Lawrence Journal-World. Winning the landmark case expanded Smith’s Supreme Court practice, he says, and looking back, Lawrence is his favorite case. But it seemed like after June 26, 2003, when the opinion was published, the whole world knew, as his orientation was often mentioned in news coverage of the case. At the time, he was out to family and friends. Smith doesn’t know whether the justices who heard Lawrence knew that he was gay. Gay lawyers in states with same-sex sodomy laws ran the risk of being arrested before Lawrence, Smith says, and even in jurisdictions without such laws, sometimes there was a sense that being gay could hurt business development and career opportunities. Texas, which led to a 2003 landmark opinion that struck down state laws criminalizing sexual conduct between consenting adults of the same gender.īut there was something else about Smith, then a partner at Jenner & Block, that at the time was somewhat unusual for the Supreme Court bar-he was openly gay.Īlmost 20 years before Lawrence, the Supreme Court upheld state sodomy laws in Bowers v. and handled various Supreme Court cases-including for paying clients-many thought that it made sense for the Washington, D.C., lawyer to argue Lawrence v. Smith was the editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal, clerked for then-U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |